Advertisement

Advertisement

Later Stage Dementia: Promoting Comfort, Compassion and Care

Recognizing Dementia can be Tricky

Recognizing Dementia can be Tricky

Teaser: 

Kelly J. Murphy, PhD, C.Psych., Neuropsychologist, Neuropsychology & Cognitive Health, Baycrest; Assistant Professor, Psychology, University of Toronto.
Angela K. Troyer, PhD, C.Psych, Professional Practice, Chief of Psychology, Baycrest, Assistant Professor, Psychology, University of Toronto.

Abstract
Dementia is characterized by multiple cognitive impairments that cause significant functional decline. Based on this brief definition, the initial expectation might be that recognizing dementia in a patient is straightforward. Not true. Recognizing dementia can be tricky, particularly in patients who present as alert, socially appropriate, and capable of providing reasonable answers to questions. We briefly outline signs on casual observation that would prompt investigation into a patient's current cognitive and functional status to determine the presence of dementia during a routine visit. Approaches to screening for cognitive and functional decline are described along with first-step recommendations to connect patients and families with resources. The front-line clinician plays a pivotal role in identifying dementia with earlier intervention having the most potential to offset the burden on patients, families, and society.
Keywords: dementia, activities of daily living, functional decline, cognitive decline.

When to Have the Critical Conversation? Issues in Planning for Persons with Dementia and their Caregivers

When to Have the Critical Conversation? Issues in Planning for Persons with Dementia and their Caregivers

Teaser: 

Michael Gordon, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Medical Program Director, Baycrest Geriatric Health Care System; Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Of the many challenges that face families when looking after their older loved ones, of the most difficult is deciding on end-of-life decisions. The accepting or rejecting artificial nutrition and hydration, apparently life-saving antibiotic intervention for an aspiration pneumonia or urinary tract infection or the implementation of theoretically life-saving cardio-pulmonary resuscitation are among the many decisions that substitute decision-makers, who are often close family members, have to make. More often than not, these types of decisions are required in urgent situations where a time-consuming deliberative process that might be expected for a well-thought out decision to be reached is not possible because of the pressures of the potentially fatal clinical situation. Proper preparation for such eventualities usually requires time and thought that includes exploration of personal values and wishes in what ideally should occur during conversations between older loved ones at risk of or in the throes of dementia when discussions might still take place. These revealing communications must occur with those that are responsible for making these very personal and potentially life-altering clinical decisions.

2012 Canadian Consensus Conference on Dementia

2012 Canadian Consensus Conference on Dementia

Teaser: 

On May 4th and 5th the fourth Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD4) took place in Montreal. First started in 1989, the goal of the conference and its contributors, participants and authors is to review the evidence on various critical aspects of dementia and produce a series of papers summarizing the evidence. After the papers are written by a team of physician experts in the field of study, then are posted on the consensus website and conference participants are invited to add comments, then vote on a series of recommendations which are formulated by the authors, based on the best available evidence that can be gleaned from the English and French language medical literature.

The conference is attended by the papers’ authors, the steering committee of the conference and delegates from across Canada representing as much as possible all the fields addressed by the papers. This resulted in 27 attendees at the Montreal conference, from neurology, geriatric psychiatry, geriatric medicine, care of the elderly family medicine, genetics, neuroimaging and the major organizations that deal with those populations often living with or at risk for dementia that included the Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry, Canadian Geriatrics Society, College of Family Physicians of Canada and the Alzheimer’s Society.

The topics chosen for the focus of the papers from which evidence was gleaned to formulate the many recommendations were divided into the following categories: Definitions, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Neuroimaging, Rapidly Progressive Dementia, Liquid Biomarkers, Early Onset Dementia, Knowledge translation in Dementia and Translation into Primary Care. As can be seen from the list, not every conceivable component of dementia care was covered, but those areas that are dependent on a body of literature from which evidence as to the consistency, efficacy and outcomes could be reasonably gleaned were the primary focus of the conference as has been the case in the past. When there was nothing new from the literature, we endorsed previous recommendations. For example, we did not recommend any changes to the laboratory work up for all cases of suspected dementia. There was also recognition that the areas chosen for review have a substantial impact on the practice of dementia-related medical care and public health care policy. All the papers were also explored for the ethical and resource allocation impact of the proposed recommendations.

At the end of each paper presentation by one or more of the authors, the results of the online voting was reviewed. Further, robust and far-reaching discussion of the recommendations often resulted in some modifications of the wording or conclusions. The strength of the recommendations (strong, weak) and levels of supporting evidence (A= most persuasive, B= moderate, C= weakest) resulted in suggestions for practice that were then subjected to the conference participants’ final vote. While most recommendations reached consensus agreement, some were rejected as being inappropriate or not supported by sufficient evidence.

The next step is that the results of the conference and the final recommendations will be submitted to a number of journals directed to the whole spectrum of physicians involved in dementia care. This includes primary care physicians, specialist physicians both community-based and academic, of which the latter often function within the milieu of tertiary level memory and dementia programs and clinics.

After the recommendations are published in the medical literature, HealthPlexus will play an important role in the dissemination and the process of translation of the recommendations into clinical practice with the goal of assisting primary care physicians in the evaluation, investigation, and care of their patients afflicted with the wide range of cognitive impairments, and the caregivers and families who support them. We will endeavour to help family physicians through various modalities of presentations including the possibility of case-based presentations that can be addressed through the lens of the new recommendations so that our HealthPlexus readership can assimilate the new recommendations into the very practical challenges of primary care.

As the editor of the dementia section of HealthPlexus, and member of the steering committee, and ethics consultant to the Consensus conference, I am very pleased that we can play an active role in helping front-line primary care physicians utilize the recommendations of the Conference to guide the every day challenges of their practice.

Michael Gordon, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Editor-in-Chief, Dementia Educational Resource
www.healthplexus.net and the Journal of Clinical Care
and
Member of CCCDTD2012 Steering Committee
Ethics Consultant to the Committee



About Health Plexus:
Comprised of 1000s of clinical reviews, CMEs, bio-medical illustrations and animations and other resources, all organized in the 34 condition zones, our vision is to provide physicians and allied healthcare professionals with access to credible, timely and multi-disciplinary continuing medical education from anywhere and on any media consumption device. The Dementia Educational Resource is the compilation of high quality clinical reviews, online CME programs, library of original visual aids, interviews, roundtable discussions and related conference reports.

The Art of Listening Again and Again

0

No applauses yet

It was a replay of a common interaction. I was telling my daughter some story from my past to make one point or another and she responded with, “I know, I know, you have told me that before.” At that moment I realized what a common occurrence this sort of interaction was and explained to my daughter, “Even if you have heard the story before remember that it is important to listen again because first of all I may not remember that I told you the story before and more importantly the telling of the story may have as much meaning and significance for me as it might have for you.”

As I thought about the issue I realized how often in my geriatric medicine practice one of the salient complaints by families is how often their loved one tells them the same thing over and over again, and they use that symptom as do we in practice as geriatric health care providers, as possible evidence of cognitive decline and the inability to recall what was said previously. I am beginning to believe that this symptom, although very common, and often indicative of a decline of cognitive function is also a manifestation of a very common human propensity to focus on the narrative of one’s life and to recall and recount that narrative as part of one’s process of self-identity and validation. The question is; what is the separation between the normal and very common attribute of story-telling and the narrative of one’s life, and the pathology of cognitive impairment that interferes almost completely with the awareness that a story or occurrence has been recently recounted to a loved one?1,2

What most of us understand at some level is that the telling of stories is a very important part of our existence. Some do it more than others, but in normal relationships and conversations we spend much of our efforts recounting events of our life and experience to others. And the propensity to be repetitive is quite universal as anyone in a long-standing relationship will admit. In fact, if one were to track the topics of conversation between spouses and family members over a period of time I predict that one would find the same topics in one form or another repeated. This includes the common topics related to work, especially when there are conflicts or important decisions to be made or about important family members that includes children or parents depending on one’s age. I would suspect that if there were a prohibition on the repetition of topics to be discussed between partners and other family members there would be very little to be discussed.

A very common point of evidence to this phenomenon is the discussion of newsworthy items and political views. Any member of a couple usually knows pretty well the political views of the other partner. When in a social setting the topic comes up they often patiently listen to their partner express their views to presumably a new audience (although this to the chagrin of some friends or family members is not always the case) without interrupting the narrative with statements such as “we have heard your views before—if you do not have a new one just stop talking”. That would be considered extremely rude and likely the basis of the disruption of a social or personal relationship.

The question and challenge for those facing the extremes of repetition in a loved one who is developing or already has evidence of dementia is what to do? Those in such situations usually learn very quickly to avoid conflict that interrupting the recounting of an event already recounted with a “you told me already or I know” usually results in some element of conflict with a denial that the conversation in fact has taken place. Also, in the context of normal aging, family members may find that the propensity to retell and recall one’s life narrative occurs more and more frequently. This is partially because it is one of the ways all of us validate our lives which is important as the past becomes increasingly important compared to the likely options for the future. It is because of this human need to tell our narratives that there is such an interest by many in writing autobiographies and memoirs and an interest in readers in learning about other people’s lives, some because they are “famous” and others because they are deemed to be interesting or unusual and at other times because the reader finds the particular narrative congruent with their own life experience. The recognition that another’s life story in some way intersected, overlapped or was in parallel to one’s own is a very powerful way of validating one’s own life and confirming its relevance and importance.

A special dimension to repeating stories and recalling the narrative is when those stories are associated with great suffering and pain. Those of us that deal with Holocaust survivors, or those who have lived through other atrocities as have occurred in many parts of the world in the last century may be plagued by the content of those stories and the retelling may be associated with great emotional reactions. This can be very disconcerting to a family member especially as each retelling of the story becomes in essence a re-living of that particular horrific episode in that person’s life.3

The best recommendation that I can make about this inevitable process of repetition of a loved one’s “stories” is to find ways to be patient with them and accept that even though you have heard the story before, actually acknowledging it and expressing an interest in it is helpful and even therapeutic to both of you.

  1. Bursack, CB. What to Do When a Parent Repeats the Same Things Over and Over? Aging Care.com, http://www.agingcare.com/Articles/elders-repeating-the-same-story-146023.htm
  2. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI); What do we do now?, Prepared by the Center for Gerontology, Blacksburg, VA October, 2006; http://www.gerontology.vt.edu/docs/Gerontology_MCI_final.pdf
  3. Gordon M. Dementia and the Holocaust: What to do with those memories? January 29, 2012, HealthPlexus.Net: /blog/dementia-and-holocaust-what-do-those-memories

 

Dr. Michael Gordon is currently medical program director of Palliative Care at Baycrest, co-director of their ethics program and a professor of Medicine at the University of Toronto. He is a prolific writer with his latest book Late-Stage Dementia: Promoting Comfort, Compassion, and Care and previous two books being Moments that Matter: Cases in Ethical Eldercare followed shortly on his memoir: Brooklyn Beginnings-A Geriatrician’s Odyssey. For more information log on to www.drmichaelgordon.com

Common Lumps and Bumps in Children: A Colour-coded Differential

Common Lumps and Bumps in Children: A Colour-coded Differential

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim one non-certified credit per hour for this non-certified educational program.

Mainpro+® Overview
Teaser: 

Shahana Nathwani, BHK, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Joseph M Lam, MD, FRCP(C), Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Associate Member, Department of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Abstract
Many conditions present as 'lumps and bumps' in the pediatric population. Some follow a benign course and can be safely observed with parental education and reassurance. Others require definitive therapy or carry the potential for serious complications. Understanding and recognizing the different lesions will help guide the care, counseling and management of patients with these common 'lumps and bumps'. This review presents and categorizes common pediatric cutaneous lesions according to colours as a tool to help the general practitioner recognize and remember these lesions.
Keywords: benign; pediatric; tumours; vascular; hemangioma; nevus.

Thoughts on the WHO's Dementia Report

Thoughts on the WHO's Dementia Report

Teaser: 

It is a positive step for all of us trying to care for those living with dementia and their families to learn that the World Health Organization (WHO) has produced a far-reaching report outlining the world-wide challenge faced by nations whose populations will be affected by increasing numbers of those afflicted with Alzheimer's disease and other causes of dementia. The report entitled, "Dementia: A Public Health Priority",  gives a world-wide perspective and reiterates the already known Canadian statistics which estimates about half a million people living with some sort of dementia in 2010 with an estimated increase to 1.1 million by 2025 if nothing dramatic happens in terms of preventative treatments over the coming years.

One of the comments that caught the eye of the media about Canada's approach is that unlike Australia, Denmark, France, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom which all have some sort of a national strategy for dementia, Canada does not.  This apparent lack by the Canadian federal government became a focus for criticism by many Canadian organizations including the Alzheimer Society of Canada which used the term, "a wake up call" to the federal government to take action.

WHO Dementia Report The problem in Canada with expecting the federal government to embark on a national strategy is that unlike the nations cited as having national strategies which in fact have national health services, Canada does not really have a national health service. Rather it has a nationally mandated framework for provincially run-health care systems under the umbrella legislation known as the Canada Health Act, often referred to as Canadian Medicare. In essence what Canada has are provincial health care systems, all of which share commonalities, but which differ enormously in the spectrum of services provided beyond the federally mandated (through the Canada Health Act) physician and hospital services. Therefore each province has its own approach to home care, long-term care, pharmacare, and family support systems for those experiencing a wide range of ailments of which dementia is just one of many that can have a devastating effect on individuals and their families.

We would like to hear from you:
I would like to submit a comment on this editorial
I have a Dementia-related question that I would like to address to the experts
 

This means that for there to be a meaningful and robust approach to the challenges of dementia from original and basic research to the clinical domains of care through the spectrum of stages and venues where care will be provided to the very late stages of dementia where palliative and end-of-life considerations become paramount, it will likely be at the individual provincial level. This will take place with local organizations including universities and their affiliated research centres and individual health care settings from acute to long-term care that will ultimately define, explore and experiment with the range of interventions that might be useful in either thwarting the disease or providing appropriate care and support to patients and their families.

The federal government can be of great assistance whether through a formal national 'strategy' or through extensions of already existing mechanisms by promoting and encouraging (which usually means funding) research across many domains of dementia scientific enquiry, from the basic science aspects, to pharmaceutical research to health care systems and delivery studies. It can also find ways to support the range of care provision aspects at the individual and organizational approaches again through funding, grants, tax incentives, and other levels that work at the federal level that augment, but do not conflict with the provincial mandates of providing care in the local jurisdictional level.

That dementia is a "ticking time bomb" is clear from the current statistics and the projections should nothing dramatic occur. But that can change with a combination of concerted effort, use of best brains and technologies and a modicum of good fortune in the world of research endeavors which often comes up with solutions either from expected or unexpected sources.

Canada and each of the provinces cannot ignore the implications of the WHO report and the impact that the factors outlined in the report will have on the populations living in the country. All ways possible must be found to support each of the provinces as they try to cope with the local challenges of their populations affected by the "ticking time bomb" through their own provincial initiatives along with close scrutiny of the world-wide evidence on novel approaches along with cooperation across all the provinces and the sectors within the country. Canadians deserve no less from their federal and provincial governments.

Michael Gordon, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Editor-in-Chief, Dementia Educational Resource
www.healthplexus.net and the Journal of Clinical Care



About Health Plexus:
Comprised of 1000s of clinical reviews, CMEs, bio-medical illustrations and animations and other resources, all organized in the 34 condition zones, our vision is to provide physicians and allied healthcare professionals with access to credible, timely and multi-disciplinary continuing medical education from anywhere and on any media consumption device. The Dementia Educational Resource is the compilation of high quality clinical reviews, online CME programs, library of original visual aids, interviews, roundtable discussions and related conference reports.

Three Highly Distinguished Physicians Join the Dementia Educational Resource Advisory Board

0

No applauses yet

Health Plexus.net, the leading Canadian Network of Health Education resources is pleased to announce the addition of three highly distinguished physicians to its Dementia Educational Resource advisory board.

Dr. Howard Bergman was recently appointed the position of Chair of the Department of Family Medicine, at the Faculty of Medicine, McGill University. Dr. Bergman was also the first Dr. Joseph Kaufmann Professor of Geriatric Medicine and is Director of the Division of Geriatric Medicine at McGill University. He is also Director of the Division of Geriatric Medicine of the Jewish General Hospital and an investigator at the Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies and at the Bloomfield Centre for Research in Aging of the Lady Davis Institute at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal. He is also Adjunct Professor in the Department of Health Administration at the Université de Montréal and Invited Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the Université de Lausanne in Switzerland and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

In the area of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, Dr. Bergman’s research interests focus on early diagnosis. He is the founder and co-director of the Jewish General Hospital/McGill University Memory Clinic and is a Past President of the Consortium of Canadian Centres for Clinical Cognitive Research (C5R). In November 2007, Dr. Bergman was asked by the Quebec government to set up and chair a task force with the mandate to propose an action plan on Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders: from prevention to end of life care, including the research agenda.

Dr. Fadi Massoud is an internist-geriatrician who received his medical degree from the University of Montreal in 1992, and completed his internal medicine residency and geriatrics fellowship at the Universities of Montreal and McGill in 1997. He then did a research fellowship in cognitive impairment at the Sergievsky Center at Columbia University in New York under the supervision of Dr Richard Mayeux.

Since his return to Montreal in 2000, Dr Massoud works as staff geriatrician at the University of Montreal Health Center (CHUM) and the Montreal Institute of Geriatrics. He is associate professor of medicine in the Department of Medicine at the University of Montreal. His main topics of interest are cognitive ageing and dementia. He is scientific director of the memory disorders clinic at the CHUM. He is member of the Quebec Consortium for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Neurodegenerative Disorders, and primary investigator of the CHUM at the Consortium of Canadian Centers for Clinical Cognitive Research (C5R). He participated in the Second Canadian Conference on Antidementia Guidelines in 2004 and in the Canadian Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia in 2006.

Dr. Noel Rosen is a family physician in active practice in Toronto. Lecturer in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. He is also the Medical Director of the Valleyview Long Term Care facility in Toronto, as well as attending physician, Seniors' Health Centre, North York General Hospital, and active staff, and member of Department of Family and Community medicine Executive Board, North York General hospital, Toronto. In addition he is a Member, Continuing Medical Education Committee, North York General Hospital in Toronto.

About Health Plexus:
Comprised of 1000s of clinical reviews, CMEs, bio-medical illustrations and animations and other resources, all organized in the 34 condition zones, our vision is to provide physicians and allied healthcare professionals with access to credible, timely and multi-disciplinary continuing medical education from anywhere and on any media consumption device. The Dementia Educational Resource is the compilation of high quality clinical reviews, online CME programs, library of original visual aids, interviews, roundtable discussions and related conference reports.